Lately I've noticed that conventional hammer picks cause you to miss alot. Even with GM mace I've still been missing monsters like 12 times in a row. Then, when I switch to a war axe, I never miss, and its hits do the same damage. Whats wrong with hammer picks?

hammerpicks own i have no trouble with them (magical ones anyway). the regular 2 handed hammerpick sucks i think, partly cos u cant ue a shield, but as u said it seems to miss a tonne.

also u may have noticed, and skill at GM level seems to be carpper than say a skill in the mid 90's. I e mining, at Gm u fail tonnes more, and archery miss towns more. kinda gay.

bruiser wrote:hammerpicks own i have no trouble with them (magical ones anyway). the regular 2 handed hammerpick sucks i think, partly cos u cant ue a shield, but as u said it seems to miss a tonne.

also u may have noticed, and skill at GM level seems to be carpper than say a skill in the mid 90's. I 2 mining, at Gm u fail tonnes more, and archery miss towns more. kinda gay.

I just use regular convetional because I get PKed quite a bit when I hunt. But it still is strange that you miss so much with one weapon.

hammers own!!! somtime they miss a few times but wuts the trouble with that a gm swordsmana somtimes also misses a few times, but i think maces still are way better then swords

yea i heard my friend say that swords at 100% will make u miss the same just as if it were at 0%...i find that highly doubtful...can one of u clarify?

_________________
Nightmare: PvM Mage
Xero: Blackmith
Pants: Fisher

<a href="http://profile.mygamercard.net/MojonMachine">
<img src="http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/MojonMachine.png">
</a>

maybe not 0%, but i found at around 90-95% was tonnes better than gm.

I have to agree...

Except... When you DO hit, and that hit happens to be a critical strike... then the damage delt is extremely great