| Author |
Message |
|
_Venom_
|
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:42 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:33 pm Posts: 1287
|
|
Yeah, bob has already said if you want change, as long as its balanced offer up whats wrong and how to fix it, give solid suggestions to get it back to how T3A was. Don't just bitch about it, and belg you have no first hand experience, so you cant offer solutions.
And as far as what cherry said, its a tough fix, because its hard to kill anyone outside of a wall, but as soon as a warrior gets a mage in a wall they can trap them easily and get to much damage off. Like everyone else is saying, beef up RA a bit.
And for the record, i do 90% of my PvPing on a pure mage, and hemoknight is the only warrior to kill me the past 2-3 weeks outside, that being said, its not easy to kill a warrior, like me and deimos or devil for example, really close fights and i almost died a lot but i got em. Theres a lot of new tricks and tactics emerging we just need to experiment more, im sure there will always be a few mages who can still kill anyone (Eraser, Weakest and myself at the moment)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Rippa
|
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:28 am |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 8:45 am Posts: 1377
Bot Check: GAMER
Location: NYC
|
_Venom_ wrote:Yeah, bob has already said if you want change, as long as its balanced offer up whats wrong and how to fix it, give solid suggestions to get it back to how T3A was. Don't just bitch about it, and belg you have no first hand experience, so you cant offer solutions.
And as far as what cherry said, its a tough fix, because its hard to kill anyone outside of a wall, but as soon as a warrior gets a mage in a wall they can trap them easily and get to much damage off. Like everyone else is saying, beef up RA a bit.
And for the record, i do 90% of my PvPing on a pure mage, and hemoknight is the only warrior to kill me the past 2-3 weeks outside, that being said, its not easy to kill a warrior, like me and deimos or devil for example, really close fights and i almost died a lot but i got em. Theres a lot of new tricks and tactics emerging we just need to experiment more, im sure there will always be a few mages who can still kill anyone (Eraser, Weakest and myself at the moment)
I watched it was a cool fight liked your tactics...prolly more balanced than before just warriors can go 4 straight hard hits n basically knock a mage out so RA should get beefed up to before imo...especially since Pets is a automatic companion so you are constantly being hit by something as a mage when before you can see all the hits your taking in a wall u are getting hit with p pots, bears, n a big ass pitchfork or bariche lol n in this system u get hit n they never miss! Its just faster than bfore imo with alot more going on takes time to adapt.
_________________ Scathach of Skye - Pure Ranger
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
belgarion
|
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:09 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:11 pm Posts: 3668
Location: Sudbury Ont. Canada
|
chips LL wrote:ummmm i have never seen over 2 bears out at one time in this new system.... dunno what your on about...
once again i tell people.. the problem isnt bear/animal/snake spamming.. its the strength of the individual animals thats the problem... A bear shouldnt be needed to win a fight.. period.. as it is currently..
you weren't that good in t3a though... dont spit shine your own genitalia...
and certain ice elf warriors dont hit 50+ every time.... only 40+ every time... and theres nothing more i can say about that lol.. ra needs to be raised.. just like it needed to be dropped in t3a....
all in all its better.... (take it from someone who played the last few months)
Again i dn't care how many bears are used, if you need any than it is not balanced. I don't know how many times i have to say this. And they hit 40= each time and not 50 what was you're point. And i am not making any comments to try to get things fixed anymore i have given up on that. Again i am just responding to the comment that it is much more balanced which i will never believe that it is.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Rippa
|
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:36 am |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 8:45 am Posts: 1377
Bot Check: GAMER
Location: NYC
|
|
tbh mage vs warrior wasnt even balanced in t3a when deadly poison came out....cuz that would rape a warrior in a second...n before that was the poison stack bug, then before that it was the invuln bug but the difference back then was speed, damage and population all that has changed,
I still dont like the fact that u have to fight in a wall...but lets not say shit was balanced in the past cuz it wasnt. In the past i wouldnt even bring out a warrior for pvp.
_________________ Scathach of Skye - Pure Ranger
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
aimee
|
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:37 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:56 am Posts: 1185
Bot Check: GAMER
Location: uk
|
|
I rarely pvp... But when I have been in this fight contest thing on Elek, I've not used any bears and still won some.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
belgarion
|
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:55 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:11 pm Posts: 3668
Location: Sudbury Ont. Canada
|
Rippa wrote:tbh mage vs warrior wasnt even balanced in t3a when deadly poison came out....cuz that would rape a warrior in a second...n before that was the poison stack bug, then before that it was the invuln bug but the difference back then was speed, damage and population all that has changed,
I still dont like the fact that u have to fight in a wall...but lets not say shit was balanced in the past cuz it wasnt. In the past i wouldnt even bring out a warrior for pvp.
Funny but there were lots of warriors who could fight against the deadly poison, it was strictly timing. And i never once said it was balanced but it was definatly alot better than what it is now. Guarenteed
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
LordHema
|
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:00 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:42 am Posts: 438
Bot Check: GAMER
|
belgarion wrote:Rippa wrote:tbh mage vs warrior wasnt even balanced in t3a when deadly poison came out....cuz that would rape a warrior in a second...n before that was the poison stack bug, then before that it was the invuln bug but the difference back then was speed, damage and population all that has changed,
I still dont like the fact that u have to fight in a wall...but lets not say shit was balanced in the past cuz it wasnt. In the past i wouldnt even bring out a warrior for pvp.
Funny but there were lots of warriors who could fight against the deadly poison, it was strictly timing. And i never once said it was balanced but it was definatly alot better than what it is now. Guarenteed
no , u just used to it cuz of the many player who were playing , and most of them were playing by mage , so u used to it, not like it
_________________ HemoKnight (Cult'S Slayer)
Hemo ( RICH PVM )
Hemomaker (Miner/smither)
Hemofisher (Order Taker)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Wizard_of_Gore
|
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:41 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 8:02 am Posts: 2592
Bot Check: GAMER
Website: http://jizaboz.com
Location: USA
|
LordHema wrote:
no , u just used to it cuz of the many player who were playing , and most of them were playing by mage , so u used to it, not like it
Lord Hema.. I think what you are basically you are saying (correct me if I'm wrong):
"No, you were used to it because of the many players who were playing in T3. Most PVP guys played mage then. So I think it's more of a matter of you are used to it, not that you really like it."
I think what belg is actually saying is that he was used to it AND he liked it. He's being nostalgic... that's something I can relate to with other things but not this, it still feels like Obsidian to me somehow. Well, minus the new status GUI.
Then again, I was never a powerful PvP mage.
_________________ Ultima avatar: The Famed JIZABOZ,GWAR Guildmeister
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
LordHema
|
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:01 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:42 am Posts: 438
Bot Check: GAMER
|
u r right mr wizard . maybe ur edit shows him what i meant to say 
_________________ HemoKnight (Cult'S Slayer)
Hemo ( RICH PVM )
Hemomaker (Miner/smither)
Hemofisher (Order Taker)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |