| DX Gaming http://www.dxgaming.com/forums/ |
|
| new thought http://www.dxgaming.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=20173 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Karin [ Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | new thought |
if there is a healing delay for fighters should'nt be fair to have a med delay for mages? just a thought maybe that would a way to balance the mage vs fighter? just wondering what you all thought. if there is one how long is it or how do you figure it out? |
|
| Author: | chips LL [ Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
um, you should really thinking about your post b4 you post them, or read like all the posts around now, mages suck compared to warriors so if they didn't have a med delay.. why would they start having one now? and med DOES have a delay, whered you get the idea that it didn't? |
|
| Author: | drvonspawn [ Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
the med delay is ridiculously short compared to normal. its normally 8 seconds between attempts, and you gain as you stay meditated. then again meditation doesnt work here like im used to as well. |
|
| Author: | Azimuth [ Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
med on OSI kinda sucks. It's instant here once you use it, but there's a delay before you can use it again that depends on your skill (I think). And right now mages could have infinite mana and I still don't think they would consider themselves on even footing with warriors. |
|
| Author: | Karin [ Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
was just a thought chips sry to have ruffled your feathers was wondering if there was1 and how to determine . okay maybe i should read the forums more . but that does'nt mean i can't post a question. lol |
|
| Author: | chips LL [ Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
ya, didn't mean to offend you or anything i wasn't mad just saying, I feel bob on the use the search function even tho it sucks ass... but this is a common topic, and no azi thats not true, if mages had no real mana restrictions, they would wear val but azi, please try a mage b4 hopping on the "they always bitch" wagon, because it has ALOT more depth then having a warrior, it takes like 0 skill to be a warrior, just a better wep,better armor,and better pots, better character build, that what it comes down to |
|
| Author: | Azimuth [ Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
Under the old system I knew the timing of spells better then 95% of the mages on this shard...yourself included... I do have a mage on obsidian. He only has about 70 magic, but lately I've been using him more then my warrior. there's more to monitor and manage, no doubt, and under the current system it's harder to PvP against a warrior. I understand this, and I'm not on ANY bandwagon... On the other side of the argument, only someone who never played a successful warrior (or someone who's retardely immature) would say there's 0 skill involved in playing one. I've spent too dam long studying and changing my character stats and skills to get the most possible healing times with the most possible damage. I had the first high dex character build (that I know of) on the shard. I was a fencer when everyone else thought it sucked. I studied and wrote down the timing of pots, fish, magic spells, weapon equips, swings of all kinds of weapons, arrows, bolts, healing times and even how long it takes me to get someone's name on the screen. I've practiced and timed these things until I can get the timing on the screen close to timing on paper. I've studied ways to counter almost any spell a mage throws at me, and under the old system there were very few mages who could stand up to me. According to you, all of this required 0 skill. If being a mage was so dam difficult, and being a warrior required 0 skill, then why was there so many mages on the shard who dominated soooo many wariors for so many years? On top of all this, I've played mages most of life on other shards....since 1997 to be more exact..which (I'm guessing) was long before you realized you had balls. |
|
| Author: | Apocalypse [ Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
Nerd... |
|
| Author: | Karin [ Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
but chips still does not show how you figure the delay for med? |
|
| Author: | Judas[Cult] [ Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
FFS? Do you have a mage??? Everytime you med it shows you in seconds how much time you have till next med.... Is that not your answer right there? By using med??? PS) Hey Chips... Didn't you realize you had balls in 1997?? LOLWTF |
|
| Author: | Tax_man [ Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
What? Med has delay....like most things..."you must wait X seconds before you can med/heal/use this again (etc)..." And because Mages use both their regs for both healing & attacking, is that not the reason they have a longer delay for healing with bandages? To be honest - I don't think its even an accurate comparison. Mage's are much more reliant on their Mana than a warrior is on his Bandages imo. |
|
| Author: | chips LL [ Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new thought |
Lol @ judas,,, and no i don't think they dropped yet,,, BUT who was talking about old t3a? im talking about here and now, t3a isnt t4a sorry to sock it to you buddy in the current state of t4a, it still doesn't take any skill to be a successful warrior no matter how much nerd pride you have it doesn't change that there unbalanced.... spam poison use invis smack someone. I can pretty much guarantee you, you where the only one to count numbers in your head write them down on a paper and study them. that means you need some sun dude,,, seriously... wtf? im glad it paid off for you tho and mages from other shards cant be compared to obsidian mages, if your such a time freak you should realize that the cast times and damage change from shard to shard dramatically. so why did you throw that in? and I couldn't care-less about YOU, I don't play the game for YOU nore is this topic about you, so posting all the self boasting none sense is pointless, I could see if this topic said AZIMUTH as a title,,, but sadly it doesn't but to answer your question azi,.... mages dominated warriors ON T3A because they were unbalanced, mages had deep advantages in some areas, um, i would think you knew that? you being good in 1997 has shit to do with what?... ,In 1997 i was probably in Disney world! sprouting my first pubic hairs or something yay!? but no one cares.. there was no reason for that,,, *cough nerd time* sorry if i sound a bit cranky, its 2:41 and my pokemon diamond froze,, and went bak like 3-4 saves, thus i lost like 10 skills each on like 10 pokemon and my garidos = bye bye yes i know no one cares, i just want to vent |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|